Masaaki Otsuka, Margaret Meixner, Nino Panagia, Joanna Fabbri, Michael J. Barlow, Geoffrey C. Clayton, Joseph S. Gallagher, Ben E. K. Sugerman, Roger Wesson, Jennifer E. Andrews, Barbara Ercolano, Douglas Welch
We present BVRIJHK band photometry of 6 core-collapse supernovae, SNe 1999bw,
2002hh, 2003gd, 2004et, 2005cs, and 2006bc measured at late epochs (>2 yrs)
based on Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Gemini north, and WIYN telescopes. We
also show the JHK lightcurves of a supernova impostor SN 2008S up to day 575.
Of our 43 HST observations in total, 36 observations are successful in
detecting the light from the SNe alone and measuring magnitudes of all the
targets. HST observations show a resolved scattered light echo around SN 2003gd
at day 1520 and around SN 2002hh at day 1717. Our Gemini and WIYN observations
detected SNe 2002hh and 2004et, as well. Combining our data with previously
published data, we show VRIJHK-band lightcurves and estimate decline magnitude
rates at each band in 4 different phases. Our prior work on these lightcurves
and other data indicate that dust is forming in our targets from day ~300-400,
supporting SN dust formation theory. In this paper we focus on other physical
properties derived from the late time light curves. We estimate 56Ni masses for
our targets (0.5-14 x 10^{-2} Msun) from the bolometric lightcurve of each for
days ~150-300 using SN 1987A as a standard (7.5 x 10^{-2} Msun). The flattening
or sometimes increasing fluxes in the late time light curves of SNe 2002hh,
2003gd, 2004et and 2006bc indicate the presence of light echos. We estimate the
circumstellar hydrogen density of the material causing the light echo and find
that SN 2002hh is surrounded by relatively dense materials (n(H) >400 cm^{-3})
and SNe 2003gd and 2004et have densities more typical of the interstellar
medium (~1 cm^{-3}). The 56Ni mass appears well correlated with progenitor mass
with a slope of 0.31 x 10^{-2}, supporting the previous work by Maeda et al.
(2010), who focus on more massive Type II SNe. The dust mass does not appear to
be correlated with progenitor mass.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.5041
No comments:
Post a Comment