Thursday, February 23, 2012

1202.4767 (I. H. Li et al.)

Evolution of Group Galaxies from the First Red-Sequence Cluster Survey    [PDF]

I. H. Li, H. K. C. Yee, B. C. Hsieh, M. Gladders
We study the evolution of the red galaxy fraction (f_red) in 905 galaxy groups with 0.15 < z < 0.52. The galaxy groups are identified by the `probability Friends-of-Friends' algorithm from the first Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS1) photometric-redshift sample. There is a high degree of uniformity in the properties of the red-sequence of the group galaxies, indicating that the luminous red-sequence galaxies in the groups are already in place by z~0.5 and that they have a formation epoch of z>2. In general, groups at lower redshifts exhibit larger f_red than those at higher redshifts, showing a group Butcher-Oemler effect. We investigate the evolution of f_red by examining its dependence on four parameters, which can be classified as one intrinsic and three environmental: galaxy stellar mass (M_*), total group stellar mass(M_{*,grp}, a proxy for group halo mass), normalized group-centric radius (r_grp), and local galaxy density (Sigma_5). We find that M_* is the dominant parameter such that there is a strong correlation between f_red and galaxy stellar mass. Furthermore, the dependence of f_red on the environmental parameters is also a strong function of M_*. Massive galaxies (M_* > 10^11 M_sun) show little dependence of f_red on r_grp, M_{*,grp}, and Sigma_5 over the redshift range. The dependence of f_red on these parameters is primarily seen for galaxies with lower masses, especially for M_* < 10^{10.6} M_{sun}. We observe an apparent `group down-sizing' effect, in that galaxies in lower-mass halos, after controlling for galaxy stellar mass, have lower f_red. We find a dependence of \fred on both \rgrp and \SigmaF after the other parameters are controlled. At a fixed \rgrp, there is a significant dependence of f_red on Sigma_5, while r_grp gradients of f_red are seen for galaxies in similar Sigma_5 regions. This indicates .....
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4767

No comments:

Post a Comment