Eduardo Rozo, August E. Evrard, Eli S. Rykoff, James G. Bartlett
We compare cluster scaling relations published for three different samples selected via X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signatures. We find tensions driven mainly by two factors: i) systematic differences in the X-ray cluster observables used to derive the scaling relations, and; ii) uncertainty in the modeling of how the gas mass of galaxy clusters scales with total mass. All scaling relations are in agreement after accounting for these two effects. We describe a multivariate scaling model that enables a fully self-consistent treatment of multiple observational catalogs in the presence of property covariance, and apply this formalism when interpreting published results. The corrections due to scatter and observable covariance can be significant. For instance, our predicted YSZ-LX scaling relation differs from that derived using the naive "plug in" method by \approx 25%. Finally, we test the mass normalization for each of the X-ray data sets we consider by applying a space density consistency test: we compare the observed REFLEX luminosity function to expectations from published LX-M relations convolved with the mass function for a WMAP7 flat {\Lambda}CDM model. Not all of the LX-M scaling relations we consider satisfy this consistency test.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6292
No comments:
Post a Comment