Friday, May 11, 2012

1205.2316 (Asantha Cooray et al.)

The Near-IR Background Intensity and Anisotropies During The Epoch of Reionization    [PDF]

Asantha Cooray, Yan Gong, Joseph Smidt, Mario G. Santos
A fraction of the extragalactic near-infrared (near-IR) background light involves redshifted photons from the ultraviolet (UV) emission from galaxies present during reionization at redshifts above 6. The absolute intensity and the anisotropies of the near-IR background provide an observational probe of the first-light galaxies and their spatial distribution. We estimate the extragalactic background light intensity during reionization by accounting for the stellar and nebular emission from first-light galaxies. We require the UV photon density from these galaxies to generate a reionization history that is consistent with the optical depth to electron scattering from cosmic microwave background measurements. We also require the bright-end luminosity function of galaxies in our models to reproduce the measured Lyman drop-out luminosity functions at redshifts of 6 to 8. The absolute intensity is about 0.1 to 0.3 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$ at the peak of its spectrum at $\sim$ 1.1 $\mu$m. We also discuss the anisotropy power spectrum of the near-IR background using a halo model to describe the galaxy distribution. We compare our predictions for the anisotropy power spectrum to existing measurements from deep near-IR imaging data from {\it Spitzer}/IRAC, {\it Hubble}/NICMOS, and {\it AKARI}. The predicted rms fluctuations at tens of arcminute angular scales are roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the existing measurements. While strong arguments have been made that the measured fluctuations do not have an origin involving faint low-redshift galaxies, we find that the existing measurements are also incompatible with an origin during the era of reionization. The measured near-IR background anisotropies remain unexplained and could be associated with an unidentified non-astrophysical origin.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.2316

No comments:

Post a Comment