Thursday, July 19, 2012

1207.4189 (Aaron J. Romanowsky et al.)

Angular momentum and galaxy formation revisited    [PDF]

Aaron J. Romanowsky, S. Michael Fall
Motivated by new kinematic data in the outer parts of early-type galaxies (ETGs), we re-examine angular momentum (AM) in all galaxy types. We present methods for estimating the specific AM j, focusing on ETGs, to derive relations between stellar j_* and mass M_* (after Fall 1983). We perform analyses of 8 galaxies out to ~10 R_e, finding that data at 2 R_e are sufficient to estimate total j_*. Our results contravene suggestions that ellipticals (Es) harbor large reservoirs of hidden j_* from AM transport in major mergers. We carry out a j_*-M_* analysis of literature data for ~100 nearby bright galaxies of all types. The Es and spirals form parallel j_*-M_* tracks, which for spirals is like the Tully-Fisher relation, but for Es derives from a mass-size-rotation conspiracy. The Es contain ~3-4 times less AM than equal-mass spirals. We decompose the spirals into disks+bulges and find similar j_*-M_* trends to spirals and Es overall. The S0s are intermediate, and we propose that morphological types reflect disk/bulge subcomponents following separate j_*-M_* scaling relations -- providing a physical motivation for characterizing galaxies by mass and bulge/disk ratio. Next, we construct idealized cosmological models of AM content, using a priori estimates of dark matter halo spin and mass. We find that the scatter in halo spin cannot explain the spiral/E j_* differences, but the data are matched if the galaxies retained different fractions of initial j (~60% and ~10%). We consider physical mechanisms for j_* and M_* evolution (outflows, stripping, collapse bias, merging), emphasizing that the vector sum of such processes must produce the observed j_*-M_* relations. A combination of early collapse and multiple mergers (major/minor) may account for the trend for Es. More generally, the observed AM variations represent fundamental constraints for any galaxy formation model.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4189

No comments:

Post a Comment