Friday, August 10, 2012

1208.1763 (Joel Berrier et al.)

"Close galaxy pairs at z = 3: A challenge to UV luminosity abundance matching    [PDF]

Joel Berrier, Jeff Cooke
We use a sample of z~3 Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) to examine close pair clustering statistics in comparison to LCDM-based models of structure formation. Samples are selected by matching the LBG number density and by matching the observed LBG 3-D correlation function of LBGs over the two-halo term region. We show that UV-luminosity abundance matching cannot reproduce the observed data, but if subhalos are chosen to reproduce the observed clustering of LBGs we are able to reproduce the observed LBG pair fraction, (Nc), defined as the average number of companions per galaxy. This model suggests an over abundance of LBGs by a factor of ~5 over those observed, suggesting that only 1 in 5 halos above a fixed mass hosts a galaxy with LBG-like UV luminosity detectable via LBG selection techniques. We find a total observable close pair fraction of 23 \pm 0.6% (17.7 \pm 0.5%) using a prototypical cylinder radius in our overdense fiducial model and 8.3 \pm 0.5% (5.6 \pm 0.2%) in an abundance matched model (impurity corrected). For the matched spectroscopic slit analysis, we find Ncs = 5.1\pm0.2% (1.68\pm0.02%), the average number of companions observed serendipitously in our for fiducial slits (abundance matched), whereas the observed fraction of serendipitous spectroscopic close pairs is 4.7\pm1.5 per cent using the full LBG sample and 7.1\pm2.3% for a subsample with higher signal-to-noise ratio. We show that the standard method of halo assignment fails to reproduce the break in the LBG close pair behavior at small scale. To reconcile these discrepancies we suggest that a plausible fraction of LBGs in close pairs with lower mass than our sample experience interaction-induced enhanced star formation that boosts their luminosity sufficiently to be detected in observational sample but are not included in the abundance matched simulation sample.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1763

No comments:

Post a Comment