Kyle Penner, Mark Dickinson, Alexandra Pope, Arjun Dey, Benjamin Magnelli, Maurilio Pannella, Bruno Altieri, Herve Aussel, Veronique Buat, Shane Bussmann, Vassilis Charmandaris, Daniela Coia, Emanuele Daddi, Helmut Dannerbauer, David Elbaz, Ho Seong Hwang, Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Lihwai Lin, Georgios Magdis, Glenn Morrison, Paola Popesso, Douglas Scott, Ivan Valtchanov
Dusty galaxies at z ~ 2 span a wide range of relative brightness between rest-frame mid-infrared (8um) and ultraviolet wavelengths. We attempt to determine the physical mechanism responsible for this diversity. Dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs), which have rest-frame mid-IR to UV flux density ratios > 1000, might be abnormally bright in the mid-IR, perhaps due to prominent AGN and/or PAH emission, or abnormally faint in the UV. We use far-infrared data from the GOODS-Herschel survey to show that most DOGs with 10^12 L_Sun < L_IR < 10^13 L_Sun are not abnormally bright in the mid-IR when compared to other dusty galaxies with similar IR (8--1000um) luminosities. We observe a relation between the median IR to UV luminosity ratios and the median UV continuum power-law indices for these galaxies, and we find that only 24% have specific star formation rates which indicate the dominance of compact star-forming regions. This circumstantial evidence supports the idea that the UV- and IR-emitting regions in these galaxies are spatially coincident, which implies a connection between the abnormal UV faintness of DOGs and dust obscuration. We conclude that the range in rest-frame mid-IR to UV flux density ratios spanned by dusty galaxies at z ~ 2 is due to differing amounts of UV obscuration. Of galaxies with these IR luminosities, DOGs are the most obscured. We attribute differences in UV obscuration to either: 1) differences in the degree of alignment between the spatial distributions of dust and massive stars, or 2) differences in the total dust content.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2707
No comments:
Post a Comment