Thursday, February 28, 2013

1302.6644 (Jongwan Ko et al.)

The Mid-Infrared and Near-Ultraviolet Excess Emissions of Quiescent Galaxies on the Red Sequence    [PDF]

Jongwan Ko, Ho Seong Hwang, Jong Chul Lee, Young-Jong Sohn
We study the mid-infrared (IR) and near-ultraviolet (UV) excess emissions of spectroscopically selected quiescent galaxies on the optical red sequence. We use the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ({\it WISE}) mid-IR and Galaxy Evolution Explorer ({\it GALEX}) near-UV data for a spectroscopic sample of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 to study the possible connection between quiescent red-sequence galaxies with and without mid-IR/near-UV excess. Among 648 12 $\mu$m detected quiescent red-sequence galaxies without H$\alpha$ emission, 26% and 55% show near-UV and mid-IR excess emissions, respectively. When we consider only bright ($M_{r}$ $<$ $-$21.5) galaxies with early-type morphology, the fraction of galaxies with recent star formation is still 39%. The quiescent red-sequence galaxies with mid-IR and near-UV excess emissions are optically fainter and have slightly smaller $D_{n}$4000 than those without mid-IR and near-UV excess emissions. We also find that mid-IR weighted mean stellar ages of quiescent red-sequence galaxies with mid-IR excess are larger than those with near-UV excess, and smaller than those without mid-IR and near-UV excess. The environmental dependence of the fraction of quiescent red-sequence galaxies with mid-IR and near-UV excess seems strong even though the trends of quiescent red-sequence galaxies with near-UV excess differ from those with mid-IR excess. These results indicate that the recent star formation traced by near-UV ($\lesssim 1$ Gyr) and mid-IR ($\lesssim 2$ Gyr) excess is not negligible among nearby, quiescent, red, early-type galaxies. We suggest a possible evolutionary scenario of quiescent red-sequence galaxies from quiescent red-sequence galaxies with near-UV excess to those with mid-IR excess to those without near-UV and mid-IR excess.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6644

No comments:

Post a Comment