Carl H. Gibson, Rudolph E. Schild
Is the accelerating expansion of the Universe true, inferred through
observations of distant supernovae, and is the implied existence of an enormous
amount of anti-gravitational dark energy material driving the accelerating
expansion of the universe also true? To be physically useful these propositions
must be falsifiable; that is, subject to observational tests that could render
them false, and both fail when viscous, diffusive, astro-biological and
turbulence effects are included in the interpretation of observations. A more
plausible explanation of negative stresses producing the big bang is turbulence
at Planck temperatures. Inflation results from gluon viscous stresses at the
strong force transition. Anti-gravitational (dark energy) turbulence stresses
are powerful but only temporary. No permanent dark energy is needed. At the
plasma-gas transition, viscous stresses cause fragmentation of plasma
proto-galaxies into dark matter clumps of primordial gas planets, each of which
falsifies dark-energy cold-dark-matter cosmologies. Clumps of these planets
form all stars, and explain the alleged accelerating expansion of the universe
as a systematic dimming error of Supernovae Ia by light scattered in the hot
turbulent atmospheres of evaporated planets surrounding central white dwarf
stars.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.2758
No comments:
Post a Comment